Originally published in Domus 476/July 1969
Mobile home production has skyrocketed in the last few years. Architects are often inclined to take
this development as a vanguard for a totally mobile future society in
which the architectural hardware
will be predominantly mobile and
mass-produced. Aside from certain financial and
legal implications (as for example
obtaining ordinary mortgages and
the resistance to zoning for mobile
home parks) which can be changed
in the future, one begins to question
the mobile home in its existing form
as a new conceptual alternative to
existing housing types and one
sees the dead end in this development:
1 - The mobile home in its existing
form still reflects the outdated concept
of a building as a prefixed
assembled box with no potential to
respond to the user's changing
needs.
2 - Because of their low standard
of technology the mobile homes are
still bound to low-density living
patterns.
3 - Paradoxically the mobile home
has not enhanced mobility. Statistics
have shown that mobile home
dwellers move far less than the average
population. The mobile home
is simply too bulky in order to be
conveniently moved. Including towing
it can easily exceed $1000 to
move the mobile home to another site, which may amount to 10%
of the total value of the mobile
home. Therefore people have preferred
to move by selling and leaving
the mobile home behind. Since
this contributed to an enormously
fast deterioration of the quality of
some mobile home parks, a rule has
often been established that no one
can sell a mobile home which is
more than five years old in the park
and conversely that no one can move
in with an older mobile home. Such
regulations help to further limit mobile
home mobility to a factory-site-site-
junkyard mobility.
In order to keep pace with the
demand for mobility many people
have acquired an additional vacation
mobile home or, as it is normally
called, a "recreational vehicle", "camper", "trailer" which
is basically a smaller version of
the mobile home (self-propelled or
non self-propelled). This is frequently,
however, unused for about 10 to
11 months per year and is parked
either in the driveway, backyard or
in an additional parking structure.
In this way the present trend leads
to a doubling of housing containers
and to a further redundancy within
the architectural hardware. Today's
building technology has not yet adjusted to
these concepts to the inherent
change in lifestyle. Newly arising
problems are encountered by obsolete
means and forms of structure. The trend today does not seem
to lead to a mobility of shelter adequate
to the social mobility.
Mobile Housing System
In 1969 Domus devoted the cover of the July issue to emerging visions of mobile-housing, an ideal with elements both utopian and pragmatic.
View Article details
- Helmut C. Schulitz
- 02 June 2011
According to the present indications,
due to the increase in vacation
and leisure time and the growing
amount of money people have to
spend, people in the future will
have their static home in the city,
a second one on the coast and
perhaps a third in the mountains.
As mobile connecting units, people
will have two cars (a small one for
the day, a bigger one for longer distances) and a trailer for vacations.
Cars and trailer will be parked in
an additional parking structure or
space attached to each of the different
houses. The different kinds of
shelter will not only form an inefficient
and highly inflexible system
in terms of inefficient utilization of
different and partly redundant containers,
but also in terms of the
interface of the various containers.
That means in terms of personal
effort required in changing from one
container to the other and from one
means of movement to the other.
New concepts of housing, such as
the plug-in and clip-on projects
with all their sophisticated equipment
for flexibility, have been generally
planned only far change in
long cycles. The units are changed
when they become functionally obsolete
or physically deteriorated or
when the family size changes. In
most cases change of family size
means additional space has to be
provided far eventual units to be plugged in (additional initial cost).
Also change for growth of one family
is only possible if the neighbour's
family size decreases al the
same time.
The relatively expensive equipment
of the clip-on systems should be
comfortably suited to every-day use:
i.e. change in shorter cycles must
be possible. The units should be
of such a size as to be easily transportable
by means of the traffic
system. The enclosure system should
allow combination and integration
of different uses into one structure
with the least structural effort.
The mobile housing system proposes:
All containers for living, such as
house, trailer, car, garage, are integrated
in one housing system
consisting of a fixed space (unspecified
space-adaptable to many
functions) and several different mobile
spaces, each designed far a
special function.
The mobile space is planned either
for change in short cycles for
wheeled, self-propelled containers
(daily) or for change in longer
cycles far wheeled, non-self-propelled
containers (weekly to yearly).
Since the mobile containers serve
specific functions and do not have
the built-in potential to adapt to
changing requirements, they might
become obsolete earlier than the
fixed unspecified space, which can
adapt to changing requirements.
The mobile containers are the disposable
parts of the system and
can be replaced separately whenever
necessary.
Today's building technology has not yet adjusted to these concepts to the inherent change in lifestyle. Newly arising problems are encountered by obsolete means and forms of structure. The trend today does not seem to lead to a mobility of shelter adequate to the social mobility.
The fixed space and the service
structure are designed to be permanent
for the lifetime of the building,
but will adapt to any change
within the confines of their structural
possibilities.
Both types of mobile containers can
be either clipped onto the fixed
space to form a normal apartment
type, or clipped together to form a
variety of mobile shelters.
The self-propelled container (electric
engine) is driven directly to the
fixed space either over ramps or
through elevators and becomes a
kind of extension of the living room.
The seats can be turned and moved
in a glide track. The concept of a
self-propelled container as an extension
of the living room might
seem unusual today. But a car with
record player, radio, convertible
seats, cushions, curtains, etc., and
with the potential to be used in
drive-in restaurants, theaters, and
other such facilities as dining room
etc., is already a kind of a second
living room today.
The non-self-propelled mobile units
are attached to the fixed space
from outside and fit into U-shaped
cantilever tracks. In order to clip
these units onto the self-propelled
containers there is a special assembly
area on the ground level
apposite each car elevator.
The assemblage of the various containers
allow for a high number of
different configurations, that means
the housing module of a family can
be dissected and reassembled according
to the personal needs of
the individual family members as
smaller mobile or static units allow
maximum of independence.
The mobile housing system developed further within a larger context
would make an integration of mobile
containers with office, work,
and public spaces (fixed spaces)
possible. As an example, new types of motels and dormitories would
consist only of a service structure
and fixed spaces to which the individual
mobile containers can be
clipped on.
The easier application of the mobile
housing system to lower densities
being obvious it has been proposed
here only as a high density
prototype.
Helmut C. Schulitz