"Most of the things I have done that have "architectural"
implications are really about non-architecture…
anarchitecture… We were thinking about metaphoric voids,
gaps, leftover spaces, places that were not developed…
metaphoric in the sense that their interest or value wasn't
in their possible use…"
— Gordon Matta-Clark
In 1973, the artist Gordon Matta-Clark bought several
small, mostly irregularly shaped and always useless
plots of land between buildings in Queens and Staten
Island, New York City, as part of his project called Reality
Properties: Fake Estates. He stated in an interview with
Liza Bear for Avalanche magazine in 1974, "Buying them
was my own take on the strangeness of existing property
demarcation lines. Property is so all-pervasive. Everyone's
notion of ownership is determined by the use factor."
Matta-Clark's pioneering work on anarchitecture was
to have a profound influence. The Belgian architects of
OFFICE Kersten Geers David Van Severen, for example,
have pursued and expanded on Matta-Clark's ideas.
Their interests lie in difficult contexts, demarcation
lines, perimeters, the use of marginalised spaces or
negligible contexts. Rather than visions of grandeur,
their architectural dreams form within the place-making
opportunities created by these limits.
OFFICE Kersten Geers David Van Severen was founded
in 2002 by Kersten Geers (Ghent, 1975) and David Van
Severen (Ghent, 1978). The two met while studying at the
University of Ghent in 1999 during a university trip to Los
Angeles. This latter city would be a major influence for
both of them. After Ghent they both studied at the Escuela
Técnica Superior de Arquitectura in Madrid, where they
were further influenced by the practices and theories of
their tutors Iñaki Ábalos and Juan Herreros. From their
mentors' work they not only adopted the need to see
the role of the contemporary architect as a producer of
common buildings, but also the injunction to find poetics
in conventional things. Ábalos and Herreros studied
commonplace buildings such as recycling plants and
public libraries, and their theoretical discourse about the
practical and the common became a working model for
OFFICE Kersten Geers David Van Severen. Since 2006 it has
been a full-time collaborative modus operandi.
Radical acts of everyday life
The architecture of OFFICE Kersten Geers David Van Severen springs from the sprawling, semi-urbanised landscape of Flanders, and celebrates it, transforming the spaces of everyday life into rigorous moments of poetry, islands of subtle but accurate beauty.
View Article details
- Angelique Campens
- 07 January 2013
- Brussels
Their architecture also embraces the private sphere, where
their work shows some resemblances to both Islamic and
Roman architecture. They draw inspiration, for example,
from Pompeii, where the private houses are open within
themselves but closed to the outside world. This is true
of grouped units as well, which often feature patios or
courtyards enclosed by the buildings. The basic element
of their architecture is the wall that divides outside from
inside and the perimeter that demarcates the terrain.
Reappearing motifs of their work include exterior patios
that elide into interior rooms, doubling effects often
achieved with mirror-like glass, the use of the orthogonal
plan, grid structures, border walls, columns, sequences of
rooms, identical rooms, references to art, and alternations
between rough industrial materials and shiny and
luxurious materials like marble and leather.
Their first project was Entrance, built in Antwerp, Belgium, in 2003. The title is literal: the space is an entrance and reception for a notary's office. Looking at it, we can see a great deal of what would come after. In the work, they transformed a windowless space into a self-standing mirrored-glass pavilion. Soon after they started to win international competitions, such as the one in South Korea to make a master plan for a new administrative capital of 500,000 residents, with their project A Grammar for the City (2005) designed in collaboration with Dogma. They were also awarded the commission for Border Garden (2005), a project situated at a border crossing between the usa and Mexico. Their winning proposal, in collaboration with Wonne Ickx, features a nine-metre-high white wall in a rectangular frame that interrupts the otherwise endless fence boundary. Inside the frame, an oasis of palm trees is planted on a grid, and there are also pavilions for passport control and administration. Here we can explicitly see the legacy of Matta-Clark redeployed in a political frame as buildings are formed in what is literally a "no man's land" between countries.
In dissonant urban landscapes marked by empty spaces, these architects seek to make new forms of space starting from non-architecture
But like Matta-Clark, they remain invested in a rethinking of the urban landscape. Urban centres today are often unplanned and unfurling zones of construction. They confront us with a number of questions about what is to be done. How can we think about building in a city today? How can we live in more compact and sustainable ways? Geers and Van Severen seek to offer a contemporary vocabulary or toolbox for these questions. By imagining buildings without context, and decoupling form and function, they allow themselves to think of buildings that can fill multiple, even changing functions. The three projects described below can help us understand their proposal for a possible reinterpretation of a city today.
For the Weekend House in Merchtem (2009-2012), the
challenge was to work within the existing context of
a traditional row house and typical Belgian allotment
(a small house with a long garden), which was to be
transformed into a private weekend house. The architects'
ingenious solution was to keep the row house as a
guesthouse and use the long backyard to build the actual
weekend house.
The new house of brick is divided in an enfilade of four
formally identical rooms that each serve a different
function: a courtyard, a pool house, a living room and a
garden. Although they have anchor points that identify
their function (for example, the swimming pool), the
four rooms can nonetheless be freely used, planned and
re-planned. This focus on flexibility is even pronounced
in the roof, where a mobile glass rooftop can slide over
the courtyard and the pool house, allowing the owner to
transform the swimming room into a greenhouse in the
winter and open it in the summer.
In the passageways, the brick walls are double so that sliding glass doors can disappear into the space between. This also made space for a fireplace between the walls across the living room towards the swimming pool. Here we can see some of the cultural texturing of their works, as this choice creates a visual register similar to the seaside house in Godard's Contempt: Casa Malaparte, designed in 1937 by the Italian architect Adalberto Libera. A cornice of white-painted steel runs across the rooms. It functions as a rail for the movable roof as well as a gutter on the outside, showing once again the doubling of form and function.
In the semi-public space of the computer shop in Tielt
(2007-2010), the architects worked with the irregular
line of an elongated plot and heightened the importance
of the residual spaces. They positioned two identical
volumes facing each other at the front and rear of the plot,
separating them in the middle with a concrete slab patio
that functions as a parking and entrance area. Between
the exterior floor, built area and exterior walls, irregular
residual spaces function as gardens. The surrounding
exterior walls — which rise to seven metres at their highest
point on the street side — demarcate the plot and form a sort
of rampart around the two buildings.
The street-side volume accommodates the store and
reception, and the other volume the logistics spaces.
The no-frills industrial interior is delineated by exterior
walls that create a sort of shell within the core of the
two freestanding structures. The volumes are based
on thin steel columns and beams and steel deck floors.
Polycarbonate is used around the structure at points
where it faces the bordering exterior wall, and the other
areas are in glass with standard aluminium profiles,
displaying the aesthetics of an office facade. The exterior
of the brick walls facing the outside of the plot are left
exposed, while the walls facing the inside are painted
white like the interior, drawing on the same idea as in the
weekend house in Merchtem.
For the office building of the Chamber of Commerce in
Kortrijk, West Flanders (2008-2010), the architects reversed
all their ideas from private housing where they work from
inside to outside. Here instead they worked from outside to
inside, forming a building based on ideas of representation
and transparency.
On the street side, the L-shaped building presents an all-glass
facade, while the south front with its plaza and a
lower-lying patio are finished with a steel grid that shelters
them from the sun. By using a metal grid that continues
from the facade into the plaza, this latter area takes on the
appearance of a stage. The glass front, meanwhile, renders
the inside completely visible from the exterior, placing
the people at work (and the work itself) on display to the
outside world. Entrances are located at the side of the
square-shaped plaza, which is embraced by the L-shaped
building. The plaza is exploited to create the idea of a box
when the site is viewed from the street, making it look
larger from the outside than it actually is and shifting the
building's meaning through representation.
The fixed functions of the building, such as the kitchen,
elevator, toilets and technical spaces, are pushed to the
ends of the L-shaped building to open up the rest of the
rough-finished interior. From the outside, thick concrete
floor slabs can be seen through the facade, contrasting
with the slender beams. Lastly, by placing the staircases in
the middle of the space and painting them yellow and red,
the architects demonstrate their focus on transitional and
in-between spaces.
In dissonant urban landscapes marked by empty spaces, these architects seek to make new forms of space starting from non-architecture. In so doing, they give a value to these non-spaces. Their proposal for this process of changing the uses and values of the contemporary urban environment is grounded in three typologies: public, semi-public and private spaces that alternate forms of transparency, opacity and their unusual coupling. Angelique Campens, independent writer, researcher and curator